|  | Global |
| | |
|
| |
|
|  |
|
With the rise in c sections these days, many women are opting for elective c -sections.....a c section that is planned in advance of the onset of labor to avoid labor all together. Should this even be allowed? |
External LinksNo external links found | Related Content [Login]No related content found | Related keywords: |
Comments
 |
|
 | |
|
|
Should elective c sections be allowed?
Absolutely NO!
The only person to benefit from a C section is the operating surgeon.
To elect for a C section is irresponsible in that the results for the infant/child/adolescent/adult can be very detrimental
leading to ongoing chronic illness conditions and /or killer diseases. From day one the immune system of the infant is highly compromised. The rationale is explained with limitations hereunder.
More than 90% of the infant atopic eczema I see is a consequence of C section as are many other serious childhood conditions.
The Birthing and bifidobacterium infantis
Let us examine the bifidobacterium pathway. When an infant is born, normally (intravaginally), the infant picks up numerous bacteria including fecal bacteria in the birth process, most of these whilst essential to normal gut function, uncontrolled, can and do create havoc both within the gut and outside the gut. A common example is Candida Albicans which, in the female, invades the vagina and is commonly known as thrush. There is one other bacteria among all of these which is the control lactobaccilis. Bifidobacterium Infantis, the friendly Probiotic.
Under the influence of breastfeeding by day seven Bifidobactrium in a healthy infant comprises 90% of the infants stool.. Now, if the infant is breast-fed for several months the bifidobacteria proliferates with the function of improving digestion and immune status, manufacturing certain nutrients including, but not confined to:
Biotin
Choline
Folic Acid
Inositol
Para Aminobenzoic Acid (PABA)
Vitamin B2
Vitamin B5
Vitamin B6
Vitamin K)
and importantly controlling the detrimental bacteria, which if uncontrolled, proliferate and in time eat away at the mucosal lining of the gut with the consequence of a hyper-permeable gut lining "Leaky Gut". If an infant is born via caesarian section or not breast fed there will not be enough friendly bacteria to control the unfriendly bacteria with consequent proliferation and penetration of any body tissue causing inflammation and/or pain.
A common example might be infant eczema. In addition of course antibiotics, the most over-prescribed medication on this planet, will destroy much of the friendly bacteria, especially acidophilus located in the small intestine.
Interestingly, mothers of today do not have near the amount of bifidobacterium in the birth process that their grandmothers had a few decades ago. A recent Danish study could not find any bifidobacteriun in infants born in a Danish hospital over a twelve month period. This due no doubt to the modern diet and life-style.
Bifidobaceria thrive on what are called Fructooligosaccharides (FOS). Best sources of FOS are banana, onion, garlic and tomatoes. But easy on th banana which is rich in starch and high on the glycemic index.
Most infants and children's allergic and/or minor infectious episodes respond to intensive probiotic treatment. Bifidobacterium and acidophilus are very potent antibacterial/virus agents to which infectious bacteria cannot become resistant, unlike all antibiotics.
It is important to understand the need to reinnoculate following every antibiotic treatment plus a multivitamin supplement and avoid sugar-rich foods, white bread and other refined carbohydrates.
It is equally as important to use only refrigerated probiotic with billions not millions of bacteria. I recommend "Inner Health" in Australia and not to be taken with chlorinated water, which will destroy probiotics. Yogurt containing fruit is unlikely to contain many viable bacteria because like humans they love sugar and will have have killed themselves by consuming the fruit sugar (fructose). For more info on leaky gut etc:
http://health-care-aus.org
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
c-sections vs natural birth
I have had three c-sections, my first was due to a breech baby the others were advised by doctors. I wish i had of gone for a natural labour after the first, but was advised against it, saying i had a high chance of tearing the first wound! I would have liked to give it a go, but to deliver my babies safely was more important, i couldn't risk it.
I'd just like to say, that i got to hold all my babies straight away, they had all their usual things done, like all babies and then they were given to me in recovery and wheeled with me back to my room. They all were breastfed, they were healthy and they were born safely. I recovered very well, never had any complications. I don't think that they are any worse off for it, they are growing into nice young ladies and my 9 month is the sweetest thing possible. It depends on how you bring them up, not how they were delivered!
I don't believe that mothers should go in just to have a c-section for no reason, just because they can't stand the thought of having a long labour. C-sections are very painful, uncomfortable and all over yuck!! And, it takes forvever to lose the weight! Some mums can do it, others can't, and that's all it boils down to!
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|
|