|
Member » lonely28 » Blog » Isn't child care for everyone?...
External LinksNo external links found | Related Content [Add link]No related content found | Related keywords: |
Comments
 |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: Isn't child care for everyone????
This is a tough one because you don't always know the exact circumstances of those families of stay at home mothers or fathers for that matter.
I would say if a mother is capable of looking after her kids five days a week and is a stay at home mum then why would she not want to be with her kids anyway? I think in this case, one or two days a week at a day care is great, for a little break to catch up on things. But why if you don't work get someone else to look after your kids unless you have a very good reason for having to do so...
I myself have my son in day care three days a week.. And for two of those days I actually go in with him. I have the Friday to myself where I am able to catch up on things that I can't get done when I have my little ankle biter hanging off my legs or running around all over the place, like appointments, cleaning, mowing lawns, etc... Basically catching up on that stuff that housewives have trouble doing when they have kids... :)
Then on the other hand there are stay at home mum's with medical conditions where it may be best for mother and child to spend just a couple of days away from each other.
While I agree that daycare should be allowed for all I also think there should be those that have priority, for example, full time working parents, parents with medical conditions.
I also believe how ever that parents that leave their kids at the day care from open to close 5 days a week and who are more then capable of going to work and don't should possibly think about letting someone who really NEEDS the space.. Like I said before one or two days a week break is good for any parent, but we don't have children and stay at home so we can have some one else to look after them....
If it were more available to all then it may be different but until then we live in a place where child care is not as available to all.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: Isn't child care for everyone????
I knew I'd get shot down for that. But I worked at my daughter's daycare centre so I'm not just saying things without knowing anything. I know there were at least half a dozen SAHPs who had their kids in full-time care and if just one of them dropped a Tuesday, that would still leave them with 4 days a week of care. I know they pay the full amount and that the govt only subsidises 24 hours a week to those who aren't working or studying but I still think there should be something in place to put working or studying parents ahead of those who are at home. I stand by that belief. And to say that childcare is good the child is just an excuse. I know that my child is in daycare because I work, but that's not the ideal situation. If mums put the time and effort into their kids, they'll learn at home more than they can learn in a daycare centre environment. At the moment, if there is a waiting list then the working mum is put above the non-working mum, but spaces are not cancelled once they are in care and I think that they should be able to cut it back to the 2 days for non-working parents if a working parent is in need of the space in order to work. Ok, give me a poor or very poor I don't care but as a working mum struggling to find a job I'm very bitter that SAHPs can get their kids into care full time and those who want to work have to wait til their kids are at preschool age or start school to get a job. I have had to rely on people I know higher up to get me a job and I can't leave this job and go elsewhere. I've been offered many jobs, but they can't work around the Tuesday off. I would love to say yes I'll do the 1pm to 5pm shift, 4 hours is enough for me. But no, some mother who stays at home all day every day kid-free uses the space instead. You can argue that home may not be safe for the child due to the mother being depressed, but if that's they case why is the child at home at all? Why is it safe on weekends if it's not safe through the week? Like I said, vote my comment as poor but many people will agree but will be too scared to speak up on here for fear of being attacked. I'm not saying that they shouldn't have access to it, but it should be looked at more closely to ensure those who need it are the ones who get it. I don't have any family around either and last year I was stuck doing casual relief work with no chance of a permanent position and sometimes I worked all available days and sometimes I had nothing and was having to rely on charity because i couldn't put food on the table. I'm a single mum not receiving child support, having reduced payments from c'link because i don't get child support and working is a necessity for me. It's made difficult due to people using it who aren't entitled to the subsidy for it. They have husbands on big wages, they have family support, they don't need it to work so why should they have the priority?
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|