|
This site gets better with user participation. Please participate... Some of the main things you can do is rate this advice, add comments to this advice, add links to and from this advice, and/or write your own advice.
ADVICE RATING |
    4.27 (Worth a try) from 100 votes (9795 Visits) |
|
|
Just had a boy - do I circumsize? |
|
|
Oh the joys of parenthood are bestowed upon you when you have your first child. You are part of this 'cool, I know, you know' club that you had no idea existed before. You feel part of this 'parents' club all over the world. Okay, so what happens when you are confronted with issues that "YOU" have to make, critical decisions, in your baby's life, and potentially be judged by whom ever you tell? In this particular situation, the circumcision of you new baby boy...?
After a few days of my son's birth, I thought why do I have to think about this? I thought all this stuff would be handled as a medical procedure? No, wait you have a moral and social decision to make as well. Now, I found out being a 'brand new parent' had a new meaning. I felt the pressure of such a big decision, one my husband and I had to make very quickly!!!
Our obstetrician, who delivers over 300 babies a year and sees over 1000 women a year obviously was well qualified to give me advice on this issue and of course he was a MAN.
The interesting thing was that I began to have to undergo a moral and religious inquiry into myself, whilst at the same time trying to work out how to breast feed, change nappies, recover from a 2.5 hour labor and all sorts of aliments I was experiencing with my new 'mother' body. I grew up in a very religious, catholic family, but somehow I ended up being a 'non-practicing disillusioned christian', but I still held very strong good natured values that the faith promotes. My husband, from an Anglican background, has the same sentiments.
Medically, there was also nothing wrong with my son's penis. So I had no where to turn in my head to use the benefits of saying to other parents, oh, he had his done because of a medical reason. However, many of my friends son's did and needed to be circumcized due to medical issues.
So thankfully my obstetrician, educated me. It seems with this day and age the practice of performing a 'circumcision' as a standard procedure is no longer advised by doctors, unless it is deemed 'medically' necessary. I believe in my local state of Perth, Western Australia, 90% of children these days are not being 'circumsized'. He went on to say, that for only very religious people do doctors reluctantly agree to doing this procedure.
The question was, were we going to? Yes we were.
Why were we going to? Well, I was concerned that society had experienced such an about face. When "all" children of in the past had, had this as a standard procedure and it was so widespread. What else wasn't I being told I thought? I brought this up with my obstetrician. I also, realized from my discussions with him, that he gave me the chance to understand why things were conducted the way they were in the old days and why things were changing. It seems these days the test is medically. If you can't find a reason why anything should be done for medical reasons, then think about it carefully and be happy with your decision to circumsize or not.
For us, the decision to circumsize was aborted, just. For me and my husband we didn't feel that it was medically necessary to do so.
However, for me if I was becoming a mother in the 70's I would have said yes to the cicumcision. Now that the trend is changing, I have to feel compassion for those mothers who have a son and need to make that choice. I am brave enough to say that I would support either decision. However, I feel that us mothers are not fully informed. I was never educated on this at all in any antenatal classes and I feel it unfair having to make such an important social decision in the throws of post natal delivery. There are many strong cases against this procedure and it's great that the people are educating us on this, but I feel that it isn't enough for mothers who are about to give birth, and from my own personal experience, I don't feel we are getting enough time nor the information before we give birth to assess the facts, statistics and view both sides of the debate and ultimately be happy with the overall decision.
I applaude those undetaking this debate. I have been completely honest in my experience and I feel for those new mothers to be, my advice would be to get fully informed and do your research, understand both sides fully, make your decision and be happy to support yourself in this decision. Another thought, is letting your son consider the options of circumcision when he is old enough to make the decision himself. Lots of food for thought.
|
|
|
Any contributed content above is the subjective opinion of that member or external author, and not of Minti.com Pty Ltd. If you are searching for health related advice we strongly suggest you seek professional medical support. View our Terms of Service for more details.
|
|
|
 |
ADVICE RATING |
    4.27 (Worth a try) from 100 votes |
|
Report |
 |
Thankyou for your vote (you can change your vote at any time). Please leave some helpful comments about this advice using the box below.
|

 |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: Just had a boy - do I circumsize?
I have two boys, and this was a very interesting discussion with me and my wife. I grew up in NZ and the UK, where to the best of my knowledge, most do not circumcise unless for medical or religous reasons. In America, most just have it done, as it's pretty much a tradition: everybody else has it done, everybody else has always had it done, so I will too. Many claim cleanliness as a reason over here, but come on! It's the West, people. These days we are hygenic, and if your son knows how to clean himself, there should be no reason to do it.
As a non-circumcised man, I wanted my sons to look like me. It'll be easier to describe body parts if it all looks the same. And I hold that for the other side too- go with whatever the father is.
For me, I pretty much was told I was a bad father and hurting my child by not having this done. This came from the church, medical practitioners, family and friends. There was a lot of peer pressure and negativity surrounding my unborn son's penis.
Neither of my two sons got circumcised, and we never really had a problem. The only slight problem was with the younger one got a little ooze once, when his foreskin started retracting, but hadn't gone all the way. This was uncomfortable during diaper changes for a few days, and really pained us as parents. But we kept them clean, and taught them how to clean themselves, and they're fine.
Either way you decide to go, I applaud you for being good enough parents to research this and find out the best path to take for your children and your family. Stand strong, and don't take crap from anybody.
Peace,
-firebrand
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: Just had a boy - do I circumsize?
I struggled with this for a while. I did a lot of research and what I came up with is.
Pro's:
May provide protection against STD's --no definitive proof --; Will reduce the odds of penile cancer; one more to come later.
Con's
It will hurt - no doubt but I went through it and don't remember anything from when I was an infant still it will hurt but so does getting a little girl's ears pierced; It is surgery there is risk, a risk that can be avoided.
What sold me was a forum I stumbled across of older men who had been uncircumsized but for one reason or another had to have it done. These were guys in their 20's 30's 40's and 50's who all said contrary to what people (women and uncut men) would have you believe is that the sex was actually better after the circ than before. Better sensation yep from guys that had, had it both ways. Being that I have always been totally satisfied with my sex life and sensations I decided to have my son done.
There are reasons good/bad to do it and not to do it. In the end it is a judgement call. Again as a "cut" guy I am completely satisfied with my body, and am glad my parents cared enough to make a choice. The fact that you are asking this question or reading these forums shows that whatever choice you make will be the right choice, because you care. Good luck Parents.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
circumcision
My hubby and I were in agreeance before the birth of our son. My husband wasn't, and had always felt 'different' to his mates and brother. My brother was, but for medical reasons at 15 months and I can still remember my mother crying that she wished they had done him when he was born. But the Doc soon changed our minds when he explained the procedure to us. There was no way we were going to put our child through that pain unless it was absolutley necessary.
I had another 3 boys after that and have 3 grandsons, all of whom have not been done, but I too am astounded by the lack of education for parents on this subject. No one ever told me or showed me how to clean them, in fact my youngest boy was 5 before I even found out that you were meant to. Luckily none of them have had any problems, but my eldest son was devastated when we discovered that he should have been pulling the foreskin back when he urinates. He was 16 and had never done so. After much intense conversations with his mates, he discovered that none of them did either and none have had any problems. The younger boys are very 'particular' about cleaning it in the bath and even more so about ensuring that it is dry afterwards so I guess we have just been lucky.
The conversation with my son and his mates regarding urination did enlighten me to the fact that none of them are done, none of them have had any problems and they all prefer it that way. They all believed that their parents had made the right decision in leaving it up to them to have done if they wanted to.
In regards to the hiv risk, latest figures show that circumcision reduces the risk by approxiametly 50% and that in Africa where HIV and AIDS are still a major problem, the procedure is highly recommended and sought after. However in Australia and other western countries, good personal hygene and the use of condoms should be enough.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
My thoughts...
Well this has been a bit of a hot topic hasnt it?
When I had my son my husband (who is circumsized) wanted our son to get the procedure. But after my own research i didnt want it done.
I couldnt understand why my husband wanted this done to our son, because when he had it done they actually done something wrong and now it hurts if its touched the wrong way and sometimes during sex. Why he would want to put my son at risk of that, i dont know.
The thing is these days we are very hygenic we wash atleast once a day and know how to keep ourselves clean. Therefore i believe that it is not nessasary.
Although i think the decision is personal, im not going to tell anyone what to do with there own children.
Its something that cant be changed, and its something that cany be decided quickly. I figure if my son really wants it done for whatever reason when he is older i would be happy to pay for it for him. But its his member and therefore his decision.
Im going to teach him the best i can how to be hygenic and hopefully the procedure will not be nessasary for him.
What i dont understand is why, when we are at the hospital, why dont they show or tell us how to clean it, they dont reccomend the procedure anymore but they dont help us to make sure the procedure isnt nessasary down the track.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
This Comment has been deleted
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
about >>to be or not to be
hi evry1 
just wanted to insert comment after re-reading my message (23/10/06 2.45pm)
---which may be obvious but i don't want this topic to be taken lightly because with anything there are risks..
anyway getting to point of this message. i stated we took my first born in for circum were told to come back in 15mins...and so on
we had previously had an intense consultation beforehand to get the full pros and cons and all information concerning this procedure.. and then asked to come back a couple days later after thinking about it..
just making sure no-one took that the wrong way.
thanks again for listening
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
to be or not to be..
hi . i have two boys and both are circumsized.
Everyone is right in this discussion 
its certainly a tough decision to make when your faced with this choice, its a hard choice as parents to decide what is right for our kids at this delicate part of their life>>but we have too!
and we do this because they are unable to do this.
if our children turn around at 16yrs old and shows me info on uncircumsized boys i guess id be thinking what are the more underlying problems to his searching and worries...
we'd talk it out get to the problems and also explain our choices and hope that it wouldnt be held against us and wouldnt affect the way he carries himself in life..
i had my first son done at 12days old my partner and i walked into doc's surgery> they said come back in 15 mins and it will be finished.. it seemed to easy i'm trying not to make this sound like some easy transaction but when we came back my son was sound asleep on the nurses arm and procedure went
well without problems.
it wasnt made a big deal with our first boy in 1999 but for our second in 2003 things had changed and people were more aware of this controvertial decision.
i had to search for someone to do the procedure as liability was now a factor, and it had tripled in price because of this.
my 2nd son was done at 15days old by a different doctor ( a doc who has studied and done research into circumsion) and also a different procedure to my first but still a problem free result..
I would strongly recommend getting it done as early as possible, less chance of infection and less fears. (as some of men have writen in previous advise)
my nephew of 8 has not had procedure, has many problems with it. always touching and pulling which has led to infection..its very hard to get him to take charge and clean it properly
so,as it has been said as they get older it is a responsibility they need to undertake and you can only tell them so many times.
but its in there hands... so to speak.
our choice to do it was because their father was done and it would be generally cleaner and healthier that way..
i think its up to the individual PARENTS.
just my thoughts on topic. thanks for reading  we walked out pas
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
Snip or not to Snip, a man's view.
Let me tell you what a man thinks and I will tell you to get it done as soon as you can. Its been done for a thousand years and will still be done a thousand years from now. Keep these facts in mind before you make the choice for your child. One reason is hygine, easy to clean and no infections. My sister never sniped her boys and she has nothing but trouble with infections. Its easy to make sure a babys micky is clean, are you still going to clean it when he as 7,8,9,10, years old. Boys at that age need to be held down to have a bath let alone clean the package. Infections can lead to infertility, my friends boy is now 26 and is infertile due to infections and had to have a snip at 24 , you want to talk about pain, he was sore for 2 months. Also, any woman that I've talked to in this part of the world would rather see a helmut than an anteater, looks are something you dont think about when they are babys, but when they get older looks are important. When they become sexualy active it becomes easyier to take care of also. Less chance of a yeast infection and any activity they partake in you have to head to the shower or risk an infection. My uncle had to have one done at 53 years old because he tore his forskin having sex, the only reason he waited so long to get done was when you get snipped at any age after 5 days old the pain is unberable. Its a hygine and looks choice thats it, it looks better and easy to take care of tthats all. It will make life easy for all, mom , baby and dad. Infections in infants and the hassels of ensuring a 11 year old is cleaning his mickey can be avoided with a 30 sec procedure that will make life a whole lot more simple for the little dude.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
should you circumsize?
One of the questions, i asked myself when I realised I was having a boy, was to
circumsize or not? My partner and I thought yes as he was circumsized and it would
save the odd questions when older, but were talked out of it by the doctor's.
Unfortunatley we were forced to get our son circumsized due to bending of the penis
when he got an erection, when he was 18 months old. And subsenquently he is
now terrified of doctors as he was awake when the procedure was performed, which
we were told was normal, if it is necessary for you too circumsize your child when
they are older due to medical reasons please inquire if they can be put under a general
anthestic as it is much less traumatic for them, and for you.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
hindsight
When I had my son, the doctor was under the impression that circumcision was a grand thing. He left an impression on me that if I didn't have this done to my son, he would have all sorts of problems. So pushing aside my instincts, my husband and I agreed. Little did I know that this would come up again some 16 years later, when my son told me he had researched it after finding out a friend of his was intact. He showed me a lot of information, and that's when I knew I had made a mistake. But no matter how much I learned about it and the lifelong consequences that could never be fixed, none of it hurt as bad as when he looked at me one day with such sad eyes, and asked why I had let the procedure be done to him. Why had I made such a permanent decision for his own body, long before he could object or offer an opinion. I will never forget that look, and that is why I urge parents to not have it done if their child is healthy. Let him decide when he is mature enough to make an informed decision, that way he also has say over how much is cut and what is and isn't cut if he decides to be circumcised.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: hindsight
Those studies have been discounted because they cut them short (after only 9 months instead of the 36 that was initially planned), and because they failed to take into account the 2 month period of abstinence that the circumcised men had to observe. The studies also neglected to include several important control factors, such as condom use, number of sexual partners, etc. etc. etc. A more recent study in the United States showed that there is no benefit to men being circumcised when it comes to AIDS.
Also, just to point out, the United States has one of the highest rates of circumcision anywhere in the world, and also has one of the highest rate of AIDS infection. Clearly, circumcision doesn't offer nearly the same protection that condoms and education do. Urging people to get circumcised because they might have a lower risk of contracting STDs is likely to lull people into a false sense of security and cause them to engage in even riskier behavior. Besides, since this is an issue that affects only men of sexual maturity, there is no justification for doing it to an infant.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
CIrcumcising
This subject has been interesting for me to read, partly because I never realised that circumcision was considered the "norm" in so many areas. I don't know whether it is because of where I am from, or by whom I was brought up, by the thought to circumcise my boy never even entered my head. This is just not a decision I even need to contemplate. I can understand those with religious views opting for this procedure but I guess that I have faith in the human body that there are few such strong design faults that a foreskin is an inherent cause of infection. I know that the males in my family and my partner's family have not had this procedure carried out, and neither of us are aware of any problems as a result.
I suppsoe that I am against the idea of unnecessary medical altering, although I also go for the "live and let live" attitude that a parent should not be condemned for making an informed decision about their child. My only rider on this is that I am also against the idea of babies having their ears pierced by parents. I feel that a person should be allowed to make their own mind up on a subject and it may well be that in later life, they take against the fact that they have been circumsiced / had their ears pierced or any similar thing. My daughter has a strong birthmark on her forehead. I anticipate that it will fade, but if it doesn't, I won't do anything about that. When she is old enough to express a logical and rational opinion about whether or not she wants laser surgery, that is when we will consider action. Not before.
So, I am glad people are comfortable with the decisions they have made. I will always hold a reservation about the need for this and I do honestly hope that the procedure falls from favour and becomes something done through necessity than desire, particularly as someone may grow up wishing this had never been done to them. However, I would hate to live in a society where your choice as a parent over a relatively minor issue makes you open to abuse and ridicule.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
i agree
it was alot easier choice for myself as all my family are curc, so i new alot about it, i also went to see a local doctor who was the ONLY doctor that performed them at the time, he sat my husband and i down and went through the pro's and negitives, and there were no negitives the only problem he had faced was parents who did it for silly reasons and then did not care for it properly after it was done i.e you need to change baby's nappie frequently for the first two weeks and there were the occational slack parents who didn't due this, much like those parents who feed there baby mashed patatoe and gravy, also i will admit that i don't tell anyone my boy's are done unless there very close friends as yes you get fround on it's really weird its like were all getting brainwashed or something. anyway when it really comes down to it, it dosn't really matter either way, but i will still say there is nothing wrong with cerc and we are happy we did it especially as my eldest son james got leukemia when he was 18 months old, and when he relapsed 8 months later he had full body radiation, chemo and a bone marrow transplant, during this time he was in a vacume bubble to keep all germs out, you should have seen my hands they were red raw from washing them so much , anyway cause of this even the natural occuring bugs on his own skin where a problem so he was bathed frequently, but cause he was curc he didn't have the problem that the un cercumsised boy's did, they would have to wash constantly in that area, the curc helped james not get any infections during this time, even the doctor said so.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
This Comment has been deleted
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
This Comment has been deleted
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
This Comment has been deleted
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
This Comment has been deleted
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
Related keywords: anglican, boy, catholic, cicumcision, circumcision, circumcized, circumsize, circumsized, compassion, disillusioned, obstetrician, procedure | |  | | | Related TagsAddanglican, boy, catholic, cicumcision, circumcision, circumcized, circumsize, circumsized, compassion, disillusioned, obstetrician, procedureBookmarksNo bookmarks found | | | | |
|
|