minti, powered by parents Powered by Parents
First Visit?     Register     Login
 
RSS

ClayCook
ClayCook | March 2007

Visitor Count on this Article

Can you help me?
I am trying to determine if the visitor count stat is working on old articles.

This article shows to me that there has been 2861 visits to it.

Can you please load it, and tell me in the comments below how many visits it says to you?

Write Answer Know a little? Give an answer Write Advice Know a lot? Write some advice Report


External Links

No external links found

Related Content   [Add link]

No related content found

 

Want to help? Know a little? Give an answer or Know a lot? Write some Advice

Other answers to this question:


ClayCook
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | ClayCook
Visitor Count on this Article
ok ok ok - looks like it's working
thanks for the feedback


Reply Reply Report
atacj05
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | atacj05
Visitor Count on this Article
I have 2888 visits.


Reply Reply Report
michellei
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | michellei
Visitor Count on this Article
I have 2886 Visits


Reply Reply Report
natansey
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | natansey
Visitor Count on this Article
2885


Reply Reply Report
Jessgore
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | Jessgore
Visitor Count on this Article
2883


Reply Reply Report
HarrisonsMommy
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | HarrisonsMommy
Visitor Count on this Article
2881!


Reply Reply Report
yasmin78
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | yasmin78
Visitor Count on this Article

 I got 2880 which matches up with the others who have responded as it's gone up by 1 each time someone has loaded it



Reply Reply Report
emmysmum
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | emmysmum
Visitor Count on this Article
2879 for me


Reply Reply Report
cookclan
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | cookclan
Visitor Count on this Article
2878 for me...


Reply Reply Report
madchanny
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | madchanny
Visitor Count on this Article
mine says 2877

cheers,
channy


Reply Reply Report
mandymum3
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | mandymum3
Visitor Count on this Article
2876


Reply Reply Report
5kids
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | 5kids
Visitor Count on this Article
2875


Reply Reply Report
nell18-3
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | nell18-3
Visitor Count on this Article
I got 2873 on my count Clay


Reply Reply Report
kastol
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | kastol
Visitor Count on this Article

Woops added comment to wrong discussion.  I  see 2870 visits.

Kastol



Reply Reply Report
kastol
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | kastol
Visitor Count on this Article

Hi guys.

Just reading all these notes from everyone is so great.  I have been on the site for about 2 weeks and "LOVE IT". Already I have had great advice and love just looking around.  I read notes that are full of good advice, notes that are sad, notes that have happy endings and notes that are just down right hillarious.  Well done for such a inovative idea guys.  Be proud that you have and will continue helping families the world over for a long time I'm sure.  I love being parent and if I can share advice then you all only have to ask because be rest assured I am going to ask now that I know I can get sincere answers.   All take care.

Kastol x



Reply Reply Report
      ClayCook
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | ClayCook
Visitor Count on this Article
kastol

thanks so much for the positive comment
what makes Minti good is the tech and website we have built, what makes it GREAT is the members
Please invite your friends.

Thanks
Clay


Reply Reply Report
allyp
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | allyp
Visitor Count on this Article
Clay, it says 2868 for me..


Reply Reply Report
Dawn
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | Dawn
Visitor Count on this Article
 Hi Clay  it says 2866


Reply Reply Report
vlooi
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | vlooi
Visitor Count on this Article

Hi there,  It said 2862, when loaded it.  Hope this helps.



Reply Reply Report
      ClayCook
5.00 (Excellent) | March 2007 | ClayCook
Visitor Count on this Article
interesting - looks like it worked for you


Reply Reply Report