Other answers to this question:
 |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: To smack or not to smack?
WOW, you have sure created a stir with this question. I think enough has been said on the smacking side of things. My personal belief is that smacking is an outlet for the parent rather than a benefit for the child, as there are other ways to discipline. What i would like to focus on, however, is the nappy change technique. I have had lots of experience changing nappies (mother of 3 and paed nurse) so here goes: get everything out that you will need BEFORE taking the nappy of, this includes having the bum wipes out of the container, opening up the nappy, the nappy rash cream open. When you take the nappy off, wipe the poo off the bum WITH THE NAPPY , then roll it so that any excess poo is confined within the nappy. wipe with a bum wipe and fold it into the folded nappy. remove the nappy with one hand, whilst having a firm grip around the ankles with the other hand (AND DO NOT LET GO OF HIS ANKLES). complete the nappy change one handed. If he tries to roll, just bend his knees up toward his chest, by using the hand that has hold of the ankles.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: To smack or not to smack?
I guess i am lucky i have big hands!! I am glad you tried it anyway, sorry it didn't work.
As for the advice, I wrote that based on personal experience. My husband suffers from depression and has the occassional outburst of anger that he sometimes takes out on the kids (he is now medicated with antidepressants, otherwise i wouldn't risk my kids being in that environment). I have watched the same situation unfold: kids playing up, dad getting frustrated, dad losing control of emotions and lashing out with a smack. He also attended some counselling to help him stop losing his temper, and have other outlets, other than on the kids.
I too reach my limits ( and i have had to learn new techniques), my kids can be very difficult, especially with a baby to deal with as well, but i am lucky that i am a naturally calm and controlled person. other people (like my husband) have to work a bit harder at it.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: To smack or not to smack?
I hate to say this but I must be honest. You might have to do it for a while even an hour. The whole point is for him as it was for my daughter to understand that you are not going to let up.
It didn't work the first time for me so please do not think it will work the first time for you. But I tried the special toy, sticker etc and it didn't help. She would play with them then drop them and then start to try and roll and move to get them back. Lastly I noted a comment that you would hold is legs but he whinged and you were worried that you were hurting him. I have to ask a question did you really think you were hurting him or is this some sort of guilt you have because of what you have read, people have said etc. I do think parents are given a plate full of guilt from society and I do think it stops them from effectively parenting in many situations. Take for example I would hold Lillian down gently but firmly as I was teaching her to lie still, yes she whinged and should get an acadamey award for it. Now if I worried about this and if I didn't trust myself in knowing my child I couldn't have achieved what I did. So were you really hurting him or was he just putting it on out of frustration of not being able to do what he wants? This is not only important in this situation but in all situations where you are trying to change your sons habits. If he is as stubborn as my daughter and if he puts on the water works each time and you fall for them, you will never get anywhere.
The number one parenting rule I was told is that you must follow through. No matter how many times or how frustrating you must follow through.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: To smack or not to smack?
I don't want to majorly disgree with some of those who are in the thinking that a child cannot understand at that young but I whole heartedly KNOW they most certainly can.
How do I know......the leading clinic for child feeding issues in the world uses behavioural tactics with their patients as young as around 9 months old. The child eventually within a time frame of 6-8 weeks will conform to the behaviour protocols.
I have researched their facitllty to the hilt because if we could afford it that is where we would be heading to with Jedd major medical feeding issues. They are called KKI and are located in Baltimore Maryland if anyone wants to google them. They are amazing.
Do they smack the kids, NO, but they use behavioural tactics and the kids DO get it at that young.
That said, we DO use a wooden spoon with Jedd. I do have a set like "protocol" with him before I use. I started with the spoon when he was about 12 months old. Now all I have to do is tell him I am going to ge the spoon and he falls in line. It works in public as well. He is 2.
I can stop a 2 year old temper tatrum before it starts IN PUBLIC by whispering in his ear about the spoon.
What IS interesting is our church nursery cannot control him very well. I completely believe it's because they can only use "time-out" verese the immediate reprecussion of a spoon at home. He doesn things with them he would never think about doing at home.
Just what we do. And what we have found effective with our son.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: To smack or not to smack?
Good for you! Stand up for yourself. Unfortunately today there are too many do-gooders who assume the worst without having all their facts. I think some people on this issue have been quite harsh and judgemental.
There is a BIG difference between BEATING and SMACKING - whether or not a mark is left from a hand, it is still a smack if it is only one.
I know a woman who has broken a hair brush and wooden spoon on her kids, and yes, they FEAR her. She is the kind of parent who can't control herself when she is upset and the poor kids cop it. That is NOT smacking, it IS beating though and she even once told her son to tell his father when on an access visit that he "fell off a swing int he park". Unless the ground had fingers, there was no way the bruising on his bottom and leg was from falling off a swing!
Don't let the people who criticise get you down. They are NOT walking in your shoes and they don't know you. My kids knew if I even mentioned wooden spoon they were pushing in the wrong direction and I didn't even have to use it - just the idea of it was enough. and my kids don't fear me either, exactly the opposite in fact.
As for laws, yep, they vary from country to country and state to state. I think it's a sad measure of society when parents (within limits) are ot allowed to discipline their kids without fear of prosecution - no one knows each child better than their parents, and most paretns are moderate in their discipline.
We are breeding a generation of kids who will no repsect authority - which we all need to do to a point to get along in society. We are also not living i the same world we lived in 15, 20 or 30 years ago.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: To smack or not to smack?
I firmly belive that the laws where I live are correct and should stand as such. Yes, I have spanked Jedd out in public and noone blinked an eye at me or gave me disapproving looks either.
I too have passed the teacher courses (in the states) for training for spotting and reporting child abuse and neglect. I HAVE in the past called CPS on such parents. Believe me, there is a HUGE differnce between what we are doing in our home verses what I have seen in others. The courses I have taken go in great depth as to the difference between true abuse and spanking. There is a whole section on it so that teachers/caregivers can be well versed in it.
Believe me, we are well within what is acceptable.
I think what this all boils down to is the fact that the "feelings" in my country particularly where I am located (the South) are MUCH different that the views/opinions of your country.
But to say that Jedd will always return to me no matter how badly he is treated should just NOT have been said....really. Come on....That implies that I am somehow greatly Mistreating my son...and that is not the case, The underhanded way that you are stating it is, to me, not an acceptable way of stating things.
Belive me, Jedd is NOT confused about what is going on at all. After he is spanked he knows exaclty why he was and knows not to do it again. When we fist started, he got it often now it is rarely. He has learned over a short period of time.
And I am sure that my son will not feel the need to "break the cycle" again, I feel that your wording in this manner is treaing ME as an abuser. Like I said before, I think that is just an underhanded way to call me an abuser and that my son needs to be somehow be "liberated" from it and "break the cycle"
That is a term her in the states that people use when referring to Domestic Abuse. So in the US that phrase is not something you would say to someone who is NOT abusing ther child. So maybe that is why that particular phrase is upsetting me.
It just makes my blood boil when people think this way about how we have decided to raise our child. Or that the view of spanking is "arhchaic" and "abusing". It just is not. It is the complete opposite.
I would put him up with the best of kids his age and see who behaves the better. Believe me I have seen kids a the mall who get timeouts older than Jedd who behave ten times worse. They get up and do the same exact thing right again. Or their Mother just talks to them. The child is not listening at all. Where as, at 2 I rarely have to discipline in public. He is extremely well behaved.
And yes, I understand the "child attachemnt theory" I have my Elemtary Ed degree so I know about it.
I don't think I'll respond to this thread again, because it feels like all that is happening is a "pissing contest" on who thinks they KNOW more.....and frankly I am above that.
I have never been one to come on here and BRAG about all I know about EVERY subject. I offer advice and tell the person they can MintiMail me if they want further help. As a matter of fact I don't think I have even ever mentioned that I have my Bachelor's Degree and have worked on my Master's. It's noones business. I also taught in K-5 for almost 10 years.
But all that aside, it doesn't make my opinion any more BETTER than anyone else's at all. Which is what I feel is coming across in your posts. Your trying to "convince" me that what I am doing is wrong becuase you are more educated. That just balogna.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: To smack or not to smack?
Touch!! It is sad that she had to explain herself or justify her actions to complete strangers though, isn't it?
Sometimes people seems to be so fixed on their point of view which is applicable to their situation and don't stop to think there are all sorts of situations that see people react differently.
To be honest, I think some of the comments here have been a bit critical and I thought more of most Mintiers. Instead of coming from a judgement position, we should all be trying to understand each other and our motives.
As I said, I have rarely resorted to smacking, but on the odd occasion when nothing else is getting through I have done it (and yes, felt horrible afterwards) but sometimes merely the shock of it is eough to pull kids back into line. I have no doubt my smacking was driven by emotional and physical stress on occasion - I was a single Mum, was working two jobs, and sometimes just not coping. NO, this does NOT justify it, but it is a fact of life we all have our breaking points, and as humans we all deal with things differently.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: To smack or not to smack?
I have found with my son (who is the same age as yours and a real worm at nappy time), that if i change him on the change table it is harder for him to spin around. I have one of those vinyl change tables that fold up, and because they tend to sink a bit in the middle it is harder for him to get away. He can't crawl off anywhere anyway! Recently he has been trying to get his hands in it too, and i tell him hands on his head, or you could do some games like where's your nose, hair, eyes etc and get him to point them out. Have you tried stickers on the back of his hands? It may keep him distracted enough for you to change him without a mess. Make sure you have everything at hand and try to do it as quickly as possible. Talking to them about what you are doing, giving him a wipe or something to hold can also help to distract.
You are not a bad mum for smacking him, and i think a lot of parents think they wont go there but, of course, like a lot of things in life it is easier said than done.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: To smack or not to smack?
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: To smack or not to smack?
We smack our kids too. Only as a last resort, and usually after I've already lost my voice from trying to reason with them (or so it feels.). I did the 'Super Nanny' thing for a whole month, and you know what? My kids thought it was a huge joke! I spent all day, every day, taking them to and from the naughty corner and trying to reason with them etc. What did I miss out on? Oh not much, just going to the toilet, eating or even sitting down for 1 minute at a time. Basically, I got no where with my kids and was ready to walk myself to the psych ward because of it all.
A childs abilitly to understand reasoning isn't apparent until they are about 8years old, so trying to talk to a toddler about their behavour like they are an adult (which is what we do when we try to reason with them) isn't going to work. They just don't understand what we are saying to them.
A quick, sharp smack is more likely to get the message across quicker. When a child gets that smack and ýel'ps', its usually not in pain, but surprise. It gets their attention, and they stop the behaviour very quickly. They also learn over time that they will get that smack if they keep the naughty behaviour up, and will think before acting in the future.
While we do smack, we do also warn our kids that it will happen to them, and they usually stop. We count 1, 2, 3 then smack if they haven't stopped. Our older 2 also get naughty corner time first, and if they still keep screaming etc or back chatting or kicking out, then they get a smack, though it happens less and less now.
Yes, I don't like smacking my kids, but I also don't like the smurf look and feeling as though I'm wearing a hole in the carpet from walking them back and forth to the naughty corner all the time. Of course you are going to leave a mark, it is a sudden pressure mark and should fade within a minute or so. And yes, you are going to get the opinions of those who don't believe in smacking, but they are the ones who usually have other family members around them to help out much of the time.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: To smack or not to smack?
Well firstly let me say I think you sound like a great Mum. If you smacked him, left a mark and didn't question yourself .... then that would not indicate good parenting.
It's easy for people to say "Never smack your kids". But the truth is most parents reach the point at some stage where we do smack - especially for something such as the Poo Incident you described.
And yes, there is "smacking" and there is "beating". Two very different things! My brother and I were looked after by one of my mothers' cousins, who had two little girls of her own - she would regularly put them across her leg and smack them so hard it left welts. She would give one smack for each word that came out of her mouth ...
You (smack) are (smack) a (smack) wicked (smack) wicked (smack) naughty (smack) naughty (smack) little (smack) girl ... It terrified the rest of us who were in our care and I often wonder even 25 years later if those poor kids grew up emotionally scarred and hating their mother. Obviously, her method of smacking accompanied by verbal abuse is NOT ok.
I have smacked my kids and step kids on the rare occasion when nothing else would get through, but it was only ever one, opened handed smack on the bottom or leg, very occasionally two smacks. None of them have been emtionally scarred and all four are fantastic kids who are considered by most people who know them to be exceptionally lovely kids.
At 21 months he is developing a good idea of what is ok and what is not, although until over 2 he won't truly recognise right from wrong and that will take time to develop.
All kids are different, and all kids respond differently. Trust your instincts and if you feel a little smack is warranted, then use it. Just be careful not to ever smack in public in case some nosey do-gooder decides you are an abusive parent and tries to chide you for it or makes trouble for you.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: To smack or not to smack?
hi there, we have quite a few children between us and have had to give each of them a little smack at least once or twice in their lives, however as with your own experience, it is always a very last resort, not to be given at any old opportunity in place of correct and proper parenting, as a child and adolescent, i was smacked, and belted for every thing i ever did wrong and some things i didn't even do, so believe me i wouldn't just haul off and clock the children for playing up, but i wouldn't rule it out if need be either, i think the fact that it breaks your heart to have to do it just proves that you are a good mother and that you love your child very much indeed. it has not been necessary to smack any of our children since they reached about two or three years old, so i guess a smack or two when it was really warranted did no great harm in our children to that extent.
Ian
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: To smack or not to smack?
Hmm I don't agree that smacking should be illegal if it leaves a mark. Maybe if it left a bruise or significant swelling that would be fair. Young children are so susceptible to bruising, scratching and marking that any smack is going to leave a mark no matter how lightly it is performed. My son fell over on my Mum's cork floors when he was first learning to walk and he knocked his tooth out of position and hit his lip leaving his cheeks to puff up, his whole face to be bruised, his lip swelled considerably and there was blood everywhere. One look at him and you would think he was being abused or had had a serious injury but it was only a light fall. I cried my eyes out for him because it was the first time I'd seen him in pain but babies mark so easily there is nothing you can do. I am against child abuse 100% and I can never understand how a parent can hit a child - but I don't see significant harm in a diciplinary smack. I used to get the wooden spoon when I was a kid and there was one time I remember when my Dad smacked me and my sister way too hard for something our brother did but other than that I deserved everything I got and I can't even remember all the times I've been smacked. It hasn't harmed me emotionally or physically. I understand there is this huge debate on smacking vs non-smacking and I'm an advocate for non-smacking but there are times when all other methods fail and we have to enforce a smack. 1. The child may be putting his health at risk and 2. The child may be putting his life in danger. I smack my son's hand away if he goes to pull something down on top of him (such as a mug of boiling water), putting something in an electric socket, etc. and if he is going to put his health in danger such as putting his hands and feet in his poo which could make him incredibly sick and he could even die from dehydration caused by a gastro infection. So as you can see there are some cases where an authoritative voice just won't work as your child is learning to push boundaries because it may not work in time and you could lose your child because of it. Before today I had never smacked my child only lightly tapped him on the hand so sometimes they got to an age and in a certain situation where other methods just won't work. In my Mother's group one Mum was smacking her child from a really early age just because he was exploring. This made me and all the other mum's uncomfortable as we are all very anti-smacking but all of us now admit that we have smacked our kids once or twice, now that they are older. I never could have imagined doing this to him before this age, so if you have a very young child you may not understand what it is like yet. And finally I don't want to cause a debate on here so we can agree to disagree but there is a BIG difference between child abuse/neglect and a disciplinary smack. I could never, have never and would never abuse a child, apply my full force to the child, or beat a child. I hopefully will never have to smack him again if some of the suggestions here work but if it is going to save him health-wise or safety-wise then I have to do what I have to do, even if I feel God-awful for doing it.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: To smack or not to smack?
No, I don't see anything wrong with the occasional smack as long as it is on one of 2 places, the bum/upperthigh area as it can be hard to get the bum, or on the back of the hand and as long as sufficient warning is given. Ie, if you don't lay still for mum to change your bum I will smack your hand, then if he moves again, Say this is your last chance befor I smack your hand then if he does it again, follow through. He will soon learn you mean buisiness and you are in charge.
Have you tried distracting him so as he's not trying to runaway and explore his surroundings. My boy did the same thing around this age, I found giving him a wipe or a jar of cream or even a stuffed teddy would give me sufficient time to change a pooey bum. Just a little idea.
Hope this helps and please don't get down on yourself, as someone else said if you were a bad prent, you wouldn't be questioning yourslef or asking for confirmation of what you did. Just try and stay calm and don't smack out of anger and use that as a last resort. Best of luck.
Dika. xxx.
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: To smack or not to smack?
I dont think your doing anything wrong, teaching your son the smallest things till he gets older will save you alot of hassel when hes older, i believe children who have no dicipline, have no respect for there parents.. you see alot of stupid stories out there in the world, children hiting there parents, disobeying, stealing money etc..... trust me i have 3 sisters and in total we have 13 kids in total, each and every single one of them are diffrent, and i have realised the eldest girl is 11 and she is the worst of them all, she was the first grandchild, she was never diciplined, she was spoiled and she always got everthing, she would never listen to us, would never understand why we cant buy her things, she argues with her mother as if they are sisters my godness you have to see them, they call each other names, everything, but her other daughter is 4 years old and has a few smacks then and there since she was little, she is the best little girl i have seen, she helps her mother do everything, doesnt nesseraily mean shes going to behave of course she's going to be a kid and be naughty now and then, but you compare them both totaly diffrent!!
but your son is 21 months, if he is aware of the world and interestd in everything around him, the he is well aware of knowing whats good and whats bad!!
my little one is 7months and she does that laughing, i do kinda find it a tad too young to be smaking her, but just letting you know your not the olny one. 
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
| |  |
|
 | |
|
|
Re: To smack or not to smack?
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
|  |